The field's marquee gathering offered a strange mixture of therapeutic wisdom, end-of-the-world urgency, and resistance to the categories that have organized mental healthcare for decades.
What stood out
Across theoretical camps, speakers repeatedly returned to individual differences, therapeutic relationship, personality, and temperament. The conference also revealed a gap between psychotherapy's public conversation and the rapidly changing technology surrounding it: AI appeared at sponsor booths, yet rarely entered the clinical discussion.
Clinicians and moments
The original report offers candid impressions of Nancy McWilliams, Steven Hayes, Dan Siegel, Daniel Amen, Jeffrey Zeig, Peter Levine, Kay Redfield Jamison, and Harville Hendrix. Its strongest moments come when technique gives way to humanity—vulnerability, relationship, embodied experience, and the difficult work of seeing the person beyond a label.
The verdict
For early-career clinicians, the gathering remains an energizing way to complicate theoretical loyalties and deepen commitment to the work. For seasoned practitioners, the central message may feel familiar: whatever model we use, relationship remains the thing.
Preserved original
Read the uncensored field report, including the full speaker notes, in Chris's public writing archive.
Read the original on LinkedIn ↗